Sample Post Title!

Fake news? Says who? Extremist speech? According to who? The latest craze in secular rhetoric is to disqualify truth by labeling it as fraudulent, dishonest, cruel, or unjust.  The secular super powers who control the information are becoming the arbiters of what information is worthy of being seen, read or heard. Today, it's political speech. Tomorrow—and this is already starting to happen—it'll be moral speech. The European Union has drafted a law that would force sites to remove extremist content. In an article on engadget.com, Jon Fingas writes, "he EU is drafting legislation to force Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other internet companies to delete material when law enforcement flags it as terrorist-related." He goes on to talk about how the law, if passed by the EU and member nations, could be a logistical nightmare for small websites who don't have the staff or resources to respond to the 'take-down' mandate within the legally mandated hour of it being flagged. But he suggests that, on a positive note, "A law could help by encouraging sites to think about anti-extremist strategies from the get go, but it might also create logistical headaches for sites with limited staff and tight budgets." While he sees some concern...

A liberal writer recently tweeted that he'd rather his daughter date a member of the MS-13 gang than a member of the Republican Party. This really shouldn't surprise us, since most liberal thought is bases on senseless emotions, not in reason or reality.

The Christmas trees are gone, the lights have been taken down, and the Christmas music has faded away. But don't you wish it could be like Christmas every day?

Getting strong takes work. That hard work forces us to see our own weakness. The hard work of becoming heroes in #holiness is no different